Jarrett’s Bio
Gregg Jarrett is a conservative news analyst, author, and lawyer well-known for criticizing the 2016 US election investigation into Russian meddling and for his pro-Trump remarks. In The Russia Hoax, published in 2018, Jarrett makes the case that the “deep state” is working to discredit the Trump administration and defend Hillary Clinton. He has called the Russia investigation by Special Counsel Robert Mueller “illegitimate and corrupt” and likened the FBI to the KGB.
How old is Jarrett?
Gregg, the news commentator, is 70 years old as of 7 April 2025. He was born on 7 April 1955 in Los Angeles, California, United States.
Is Gregg Jarrett married?
On September 11, 1993, Jarrett wed Catherine Kennedy Anderson in New York’s Calvary Episcopal Church. They are parents of two kids.
Gregg Jarrett Arrest
Police at Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport detained Jarrett in May 2014 after they were called to an airport bar following complaints that he seemed drunk and behaved aggressively. After being arrested for misdemeanor interference with a police officer for being “belligerent and uncooperative,” Jarrett was released from the Hennepin County Jail after posting a $300 bond. In February 2016, the charge against Jarrett was dropped. According to CNN, Jarrett was dealing with “personal issues” and had just checked out of a rehabilitation center when he was arrested.
The Russia Hoax
According to author Jarrett’s 2018 book The Russia Hoax, Hillary Clinton’s deep state allies engaged in illicit activities to defend Clinton and discredit Trump. President Trump commended the book, which became a New York Times and Amazon bestseller. With the concept that the Clinton email investigation may be abandoned and the Russia inquiry revived a few months later as a conspiracy, Rolling Stone magazine described the book as a 286-page compendium of all the Clintons’ claims. According to Carlos Lozada, the book is a Trump hagiography. Five of the book’s assertions were deemed untrue, deceptive, and unsupported by PolitiFact.
What happened to Jarrett on Fox News?
In November 2002, Jarrett began working for Fox News. Jarrett was at MSNBC before coming to Fox. Additionally, Jarrett spent eight years as the anchor of Prime Time Justice at Court TV, which is now known as TruTV. Inside America’s Courts, the network’s nationally syndicated half-hour magazine show, was presented by him. It aired on CNBC on weekends and on broadcast stations (NBC in New York City and Los Angeles) every day.
Jarrett worked for several local channels before joining Court TV. such as KSNW-TV in Wichita, Kansas; WMDT-TV in Salisbury, Maryland; WKFT-TV in Fayetteville, North Carolina; and KCSM-TV in San Francisco, California. He won a Heartland Emmy Award for the “Turnpike Tornado” news segment while he was working at KSNW.
As a legal analyst, Jarrett has typically supported President Donald Trump, opposing the Mueller probe and advocating for a grand jury trial for Hillary Clinton. He gave the FBI a “Pants on Fire” rating from PolitiFact, comparing it to the Soviet security agency, the KGB. Additionally, Jarrett has maintained that there is no criminal penalty for collaboration between the Russian government and Trump’s campaign, saying that “collusion is not a crime.”
in antitrust law only. In an election, you can conspire with a foreign government all you want. Such a statute does not exist. Regardless of whether they specifically address collusion, PolitiFact contends that at least four statutes would forbid the kinds of actions being looked into.
According to Jarrett, former FBI Director James Comey may have violated the law when he leaked a document to the media in which Comey described a meeting with President Trump in which Trump asked Comey to terminate the investigation into Michael Flynn. Professors Bobby Chesney of the University of Texas School of Law and Diane Marie Amann of the University of Georgia School of Law, however, denied this claim. HuffPost called Jarrett’s February 2018 allegation that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein threatened members of Congress by abusing his office’s authority “dubious.”